Materiality and the Accident

This idea of the book as a process, as Hélène Cixous writes, lets things happen, evolves with the process. Odilon Pain was talking to us about his practice and the return to painting. The need for materiality and the appearance of the accident. The word accident is, in my opinion to close to mistake. Accidents:  marks, drips, peeping undercoats are the thinking of painting, the turn of hand, the unexpected that takes a concept and makes it into something. 

I have no doubt that this is the process but what of the observed object? I do have my doubts about the spectator, the subject. Are they looking for a diversion or an object of contemplation? I suppose it’s like this glass of wine, it depends on the moment, on the who, on the whatever. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s